What happens when late-night comedy collides with raw political tension? In September 2025, Jimmy Kimmel found himself at the center of a media storm after comments he made about Charlie Kirk’s death sent shockwaves across TV networks, political circles, and social media. The fallout was so intense that Jimmy Kimmel Live was suspended—an unprecedented move for one of America’s longest-running talk shows.
So, what did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk, why did it spark such an uproar, and how did both he and his critics respond? Let’s unpack the whirlwind.
The Monologue That Started It All
On September 16, 2025, just days after conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot and killed, Jimmy Kimmel used his opening monologue to address how political leaders were reacting. He accused Donald Trump and his allies of trying to “capitalise on the murder” for political gain.
Kimmel pulled no punches. He:
-
Mocked Trump’s response to being asked how he was coping, quipping that the former president was in the “fourth stage of grief: construction.”
-
Compared Trump’s reaction to “a four-year-old mourning a goldfish” rather than an adult grieving a friend.
-
Highlighted what he saw as hypocrisy in Republican rhetoric, pointing to January 6 rioters who targeted Mike Pence and contrasting it with Vice President JD Vance’s claim that “most lunatics in politics are far-left.”
His sharpest line may have been calling out the “MAGA gang” for “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them.”
For fans, this was biting satire. For critics, especially on the right, it was insensitive and inflammatory at a time of national mourning.
Why Did ABC Suspend the Show?
Two days later, ABC and parent company Disney announced that Jimmy Kimmel Live would be suspended indefinitely. The decision shocked viewers—late-night comedy has long been a space for political jabs, after all.
Disney later explained that the suspension was not about silencing political opinions but about timing. They said some of Kimmel’s remarks felt “ill-timed and thus insensitive” in the immediate aftermath of Kirk’s killing.
Behind the scenes, the pressure was enormous:
-
FCC chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump supporter, threatened regulatory “action” against Disney and ABC.
-
Sinclair and NexStar, two of the biggest owners of ABC affiliates, announced they would stop airing the show altogether. Together, they control about 20% of ABC stations in the U.S.
-
Trump himself celebrated the suspension on Truth Social, calling the show “cancelled” and branding Kimmel “ratings challenged” and “talentless.”
For ABC, pulling the plug—at least temporarily—was damage control.
Jimmy Kimmel’s Emotional Comeback
After a week of “thoughtful conversations” with Disney executives, Jimmy Kimmel Live returned. In his comeback monologue, Kimmel appeared visibly emotional and clarified his intent.
“I don’t think there’s anything funny about [Charlie Kirk’s death],” he told viewers. “Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group… that was really the opposite of the point I was trying to make.”
Kimmel admitted his comments may have felt “ill-timed or unclear, or maybe both.” He praised Erika Kirk, Charlie’s widow, for forgiving her husband’s killer at the memorial service—calling her words “a selfless act of grace that touched me deeply.”
But he also came out swinging against the decision to suspend his show:
-
He slammed ABC affiliates who refused to resume broadcasting, saying: “That’s not legal. That’s not American. It’s un-American.”
-
He thanked fellow late-night hosts who spoke up for him, noting: “It takes courage to stand against this administration.”
-
And in a cheeky nod to Trump’s attempts to cancel him, he joked: “He tried his best to cancel me and instead he forced millions of people to watch this show.”
The Trump Factor
It’s no secret that Jimmy Kimmel and Donald Trump have been at odds for years. Trump has repeatedly accused Kimmel (and other late-night hosts like Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers) of acting as “arms of the Democratic Party.”
After Kimmel’s suspension, Trump gloated, claiming the host was “fired for bad ratings.” When the show returned, Trump fumed that ABC was making an “illegal campaign contribution” by allowing what he called “99% Democrat garbage” on air. He hinted at further “tests” for Disney and ABC—words that some read as threats.
In truth, Trump’s disdain only amplifies Kimmel’s reach. Late-night hosts thrive on ridicule, and feuding with a former president keeps Kimmel in the headlines.
A Bigger Question: Comedy vs. Crisis
The Kimmel-Kirk controversy shines a spotlight on a broader issue: where do we draw the line between comedy and commentary during times of national tragedy?
-
For some, Kimmel’s monologue was an attempt to hold political leaders accountable in their handling of grief and violence.
-
For others, his timing—so soon after Kirk’s death—was tasteless, turning a solemn moment into a punchline.
This isn’t the first time late-night hosts have faced backlash for political jokes. But suspending a major network show over a monologue? That’s new territory. It raises questions about free speech, corporate caution, and the role of comedy in polarized times.
Surprising Facts About The Suspension Saga
-
Unprecedented Move: ABC has suspended episodes for strikes, technical issues, and holidays—but never before for political remarks.
-
Affiliate Power: Sinclair and NexStar’s refusal to air the show meant millions of households lost access, even after Disney reinstated it.
-
Emotional Tone: Kimmel’s comeback monologue marked one of the few times he appeared tearful on air, recalling his 2017 healthcare plea for his newborn son.
-
Erika Kirk’s Forgiveness: Her act of public forgiveness stood in stark contrast to Trump’s statement at the same memorial, where he declared he would “never forgive” political opponents.
-
Ratings Spike: Ironically, the suspension drew massive attention—Kimmel’s return episode hit the highest ratings of the year.
Personal Insight
Honestly, I was struck by how quickly a late-night joke spiraled into a full-on political scandal. It reminded me of how even in everyday conversations, timing can matter more than intent. I once cracked a sarcastic line at a family dinner right after some bad news—only to regret it immediately. Kimmel’s case was on a much bigger stage, but the lesson feels the same: words land differently depending on the moment.
Conclusion
So, what did Jimmy Kimmel say about Charlie Kirk? He accused Trump and the MAGA movement of exploiting Kirk’s tragic death, mocked Trump’s bizarre grieving response, and called out Republican hypocrisy. The backlash was swift and fierce, leading to a suspension that highlighted the fragile balance between comedy, politics, and grief.
Do you think late-night hosts should avoid tragedy altogether, or is it their job to challenge how leaders respond to it?